Friday, October 10, 2014

31 Days of Horror-Day 10: Saw (2004)

(dir. James Wan )


      In light of its 10th anniversary I decided it was time to revisit Saw. James Wan’s first feature arguably ushered in the most significant shakeup in the horror genre since Scream. For the first few years of the franchise, the Saw films were the talk of Halloween amongst high-school age moviegoers. And at least in my circle, people were categorized by those who could handle Saw and those who couldn’t. While the much of the shock factor has faded (perhaps a result of seeing too many horror movies) and parts of the film haven’t held up too well, Jigsaw’s motivation is still just as compelling and memorable.

     Saw feels like a delayed result of Seven and it seems Wan is attempting to capture some of that aesthetic here, but there’s a 70s drive-in quality to the filmmaking and performances that’s unshakeable. Saw had the makings of a cult film before it ever became one. There are some odd directorial choices such as the rapid music video-esque cuts in the flashback sequences and use of quick montages. It’s quite interesting to see how much Wan has grown from this to The Conjuring, so much so that films feel like the work of entirely different directors. What Wan and his writing partner, Leigh Whannell excel at is creating clever plots. While there are a number of dumb things the characters do in the movie, the concept is smart and the finale is still chilling. It’s still easy to see why audiences and studio honchos thought it was worth a sequel, though maybe not six.


Scare Factor: 2/5 Saw is probably one of the most widely watched modern horror films, but if it’s been a while since you’ve seen it it’s worth a rewatch. While the genre has shifted again, and sequel fatigue and paranormal activities put the franchise to rest, the original remains a messy, yet clever film with a frightening concept and a decent execution. 

Thursday, October 9, 2014

31 Days of Horror-Day 9: Hellraiser (1987)

(dir. Clive Barker )



     Hellraiser is a truly impressive and horrifying directorial debut from Clive Barker. Based on Barker’s novella, The Hellbound Heart, the film centers on Frank Cotton, a sadomasochist whose search for the absolute in pleasure and pain lead him to a mysterious puzzle box. The box sends Frank, and later his family, into a terrifying and painful confrontation with the Cenobites, “demons to some, angels to others.” Hellrasier’s wildly imaginative exploration of the sublime sets it apart from its horror contemporaries.

     Even decades later the effects hold up incredibly well, well enough to still cause near unrelenting queasiness. Hellraiser rivals David Cronenberg’s The Fly and John Carpenter’s The Thing with some of the best practical horror effects I’ve seen, though I think Barker’s film lacks the same level of re-watchability. While the film is incredibly gory, the unique set and character designs separate it from being just another splatter flick. Beyond its graphic nature, there is a clear artistry to the film. While the characters lack depth, there is quite a lot of plot which ensures that the film never feels dull or like it’s relying too heavily on one thing.

Scare Factor: 5/5 With this film, Barker operates on a level beyond basic jumps scares and light tricks, and instead creates a weightier horror that isn’t what I’d call fun, but memorably effective.  Hellraiser is one of the best the genre has to offer, there’s really nothing like it.


**Available to watch on Netflix Instant 

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

31 Days of Horror-Day 8: The Quiet Ones (2014)

(dir. John Pogue)




*First time viewing

     Inspired by true events, The Quiet Ones centers on a psychologist who, along with two of his best students and a cameraman, attempts to cure mental illness through a parapsychology experiment on a young woman with telekinetic abilities. The film attempts to explore the separation between the occult and science, but these ideas are swallowed up by dry exposition and a muddled plot.

     I was hoping Hammer Films’ work on this would match the same quality as their other recent revival films, Let Me In and The Woman In Black. Unfortunately, The Quiet Ones takes an interesting event and turns it into a lifeless affair, nearly devoid of tension. The biggest issue is the film’s lack of identity. It’s part found-footage and part traditional film, it's part serious drama and part clichéd gimmickry. None of these parts are fully effective, resulting in a film that feels like compromised play at the current paranormal horror boom. While true horror dramas have somewhat fallen by the wayside in mainstream efforts, it’s a shame that the The Quiet Ones couldn’t have taken a risk with the story and delivered something truly memorable. 


Scare Factor: 1/5 There’s nothing terrifying about the The Quiet Ones and even the jump scares lack effectiveness. Despite some solid performances by Jared Harris and Olivia Cooke, it’s a disappointing effort for what could have been a very original and adult horror film.

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

31 Days of Horror-Day 7: Afflicted (2013)

(dirs. Derek Lee, Clif Prowse )



*First time viewing

     While the horror genre is littered with found-footage films of varying degrees of quality, most haven’t really stepped outside of the supernatural playground. Afflicted offers a little something different in the form of a really solid transformation movie that’s part Chronicle and part An American Werewolf in London. The film follows friends, Derek and Clif on their world travels for their web series. In Paris, Derek goes home with a girl he meets at a club and contracts a disease that turns him into a vampire.

      Like most found-footage films, Afflicted requires some suspension of disbelief at that fact that the characters are still concerned with filming while the shit is hitting the fan. But some impressive effects work and POV scenes more than make up for whatever concerns in logic there may be. Afflicted is one of the best shot found-footage films I’ve seen and Lee and Prowse do an impressive job pulling off triple duty as screenwriters, directors and lead actors. Derek’s transformation is really interesting to watch and the film does a good job of delving into the changes his body undergoes (there’s a particularly gnarly moment involving an eye). The film adds some new layers to vampire lore while also posing some realistic difficulties that help the film avoid some of the usual clichés. Best of all, the film presents vampirism as a frightening form of savagery, breaking away from the gothic depiction.


Scare Factor: 3/5 The film has a few great scares and gross-out moments that are really aided by the POV camera work. Most impressively, the film presents an unneutered version of the vampire that has sadly been missing in movies for quite a while. If you’re looking for a good modern vampire flick check out Afflicted, which is still available at the Redbox.

Monday, October 6, 2014

31 Days of Horror-Day 6: Children of the Corn (1984)

(dir. Fritz Kiersch )


    Children of the Corn isn’t a particularly well-crafted horror film, and yet I find it to be extremely likable, a film that is powered by its 80s cheesiness and compelling concept. On their way through Nebraska, Vicky and Burt find themselves stranded in the town of Gatlin. There are no adults in Gatlin, only children led by the child-preacher Isaac, a prophet for an entity known as He Who Walks Behind the Rows. Vicky and Burt must avoid becoming sacrifices at the hands religiously devoted children. The story, as presented here, is a much milder version of Stephen King’s original short story, complete with a couple of cute, helpful kids, and some easily defeatable threats of danger. It’s an odd mashup of a family friendly film and a dark commentary on religion. 

     It takes a while for the film to really get going, and the story feels like it’s spinning its wheels at points. But it is Courtney Gains and John Franklin as Malachai and Isaac respectively, who keep the film from becoming dull. It is really their wonderfully over-the-top performances that has kept the film within our popular culture.

Scare Factor: 1/5 The concept is indeed creepy, though its execution here is often more fit for laughs. Still, it’s an appropriately themed Halloween film and given the right mood it’s an enjoyable one at that. For a genuinely frightening take on the story, check out Stephen King’s original short story, available in his first short story collection, Night Shift.


**Available to watch on Netflix Instant 

Gotham Watch- Season 1: Episodes 1 and 2








        The Batman comics have a long history of exploring Gotham’s past, but Fox’s new show is the first attempt to really explore that material on film and delve into the lives of the supporting characters. There’s a lot of potential here for a long running show, but also a number of pitfalls that could prove challenging in the future. As a longtime comic reader, here’s my take on the first 2 episodes of Fox’s Gotham.

 Possible spoilers ahead.

1.      Concept and Tone: When it was announced, many speculated the show would be similar to Ed Brubaker and Greg Rucka’s Gotham Central, and while the show does share some of the elements of the series it is less focused on the smaller, intimate picture. Essentially Gotham is a ‘what if’ take on the idea that most of Batman’s primary villains started on their career paths a good ten to fifteen years before Bruce suits up. The show clearly takes a number of cues from Frank Miller’s Batman: Year One, mixes in some of the thematics of Nolan’s film, and a healthy dose of the more freakish and pulpier comic elements. The tone is a bit oddball and I like that; it feels like an interesting mashup of the Batman aesthetics.

 Brubaker and Rucka's Gotham Central, art by Michael Lark
                                   

2.      Death in the Family: The Wayne’s murders took place a little early. While, we know the Waynes have to die eventually, I was hoping that this could be held off until the middle or end of the season. On one hand, it does give Gordon and Bullock a case that the show can sustain and twist around for a while, but on the other it denies the show an opportunity to explore a facet that even the comics haven’t opened much: Bruce’s relationship with his parents. There haven’t been many opportunities to really know the Waynes (Greg Rucka’s Batman: Death and Maidens and Scott Snyder’s Batman: Zero Year are probably the best at example at injecting the Waynes with some character). For most of Batman’s 75 year history, Thomas and Martha have never really been taken off the mantle and made into real flesh and blood human beings. I think an exploration of this would have added a greater sense of understanding to Bruce’s drive and his inability to heal. While Bruce had a positive relationship with his parents, his reaction to their death is by no means normal. So what kind of parents were the Waynes to shape a boy like that? Maybe we’ll be treated to some flashbacks that touch on this later down the road.

                                 Batman #0 (1994) by Doug Moench, art by Mike Manley

3.      Dynamic Duo: Gordon and Bullock’s relationship forms the crux of the show and both Ben McKenzie and Donal Louge make compelling leads. Their buddy cop banter also adds some levity to a rather somber show. I appreciate the fact that so far the show has given them actual cases to solve, and hopefully this continues and they don’t simply turn into superheroes with badges. Despite the fact that Gordon and Bullock are the shows leads they sometimes feel sidelined by the introduction of too many characters. Hopefully this will even out as the show progresses, but at this moment I’d much rather see more of Gordon and Bullock than whatever sub-plot is happening with Gordon and his fiancé, Barbara.


Batman:Earth One by Geoff Johns, art by Gary Frank

4.      Master Wayne: David Mazouz gives an impressive performance as Bruce, capturing not only his intense fixations but also his earnest compassion and interest in doing good. I hope that as the show goes on we get to see all of the training Bruce went through in his preparation to become Batman, a preparation far more exciting than any of the films have shown. I’m not crazy about Sean Pertwee’s Alfred. There’s a bit of Michael Kane is his performance but he creates a much harsher figure, more like the grizzled soldier in Geoff Johns’ Batman: Earth One. While he seems far more capable of rearing a child than comic-book Alfred, he also makes Bruce’s transformation into Batman seem far less likely from a standpoint of character consistency.


Batman:Earth One by Geoff Johns, art by Gary Frank


5.      Organized Crime:  The mob element of the show is working well so far and ties in pretty closely to the comics and the idea of the mob being supplanted by the freaks. Jada Pinkett Smith’s Fish Mooney is over the top but entertaining. Her character, who doesn’t exist in the comics, is an interesting choice for a first season baddie. I’m calling it now that she doesn’t make it out of the first season alive. The show’s mob boss Carmine Falcone is a bit of a bland cliche, and I would’ve liked to see something more akin to his representation in the current Batman: Eternal. Right now, I’d be far more fearful of Mooney than Falcone.


Batman Eternal #2 (2014) art by Jason Fabok


6.      The Cat and the Penguin: Robin Lord Taylor’s Oswald Cobblepot is definitely the show’s highlight and he completely steals every scene he’s in. I think his progression over the seasons will be the most interesting to watch. Of all of the show's villains (or pre-villains) his inclusion feels the most necessary in staying true to the comic mythos. Carmen Bicondova has a strong handle on Selina Kyle’s personality and while she hasn’t had much to do yet, her storyline could end up rivaling Cobblepot’s. I do hope, however, that show will stop trying so hard to shove the fact that these characters will become The Penguin and Catwoman at every chance they get. For a show based in the world of such iconic characters, the writers don’t have to try so hard to remind people of that.


Catwoman #21 (2013) by Ann Nocenti, cover by Rachel and Terry Dodson


7.      Future Plans and Hints: Gotham is delivering some very off-key characters, which is part of what makes the show so interesting and different from the usual police procedurals. Episode two points us to the villian responsible for kidnapping Gotham's homeless youth, Barton Mathis-The Dollmaker, a fairly recent Batman villain who’s most noteworthy act was removing the Joker’s face (at his behest). Barton Mathis’s father was a cannibal and a serial killer who was killed by Jim Gordon. Barton eventually became The Dollmaker and wore a mask made from his father’s face. He’s a particularly grim character whose close connection to Jim Gordon may be something we see play out later this season.

Batman: Detective Comics Vol. 1: Faces of Death by Tony Daniel



8.      Concerns: My main issue with the show thus far is that we’re getting a lot of concepts and characters very quickly. While I think it’s interesting to see some of these characters before they became the iconic villains, there comes a point when the planned introductions of Harvey Dent, pre-Joker, and unfrozen Mr. Freeze take away from the believability of this world for the sake of convenience. Batman comics have long relied on the concept of Batman’s villains emerging because of his existence (Christopher Nolan termed this “escalation” in Batman Begins.) So assuming this show is aiming to be on for the long haul, there will come a time when these pre-villains will need to become full-fledged criminals in order to maintain momentum. And if we’re getting supervillain monikers, masks, and crimes that Gordon and the rest of the GCPD can handle before Batman, what then is the point of a Batman? While I may be getting ahead of myself here, I do think it’s an interesting conundrum that the show may have to deal with at some point.




Verdict: I think the first few episodes show that Gotham is still finding its footing as network shows must do, but it’s off to a much better start than most comic-based shows.

Gotham airs Monday on Fox 8/7c

Sunday, October 5, 2014

31 Days of Horror-Day 5: House on Haunted Hill (1959)

(dir. William Castle)



*First time viewing

     While I strongly believe that everyone needs at least one dose of Vincent Price in their Halloween festivities, House on Haunted Hill is probably not your best option. The film follows an eccentric billionaire who invites five guests to a supposedly haunted house for his wife’s birthday. Whoever can survive a night in the mansion will be rewarded with $10,000. While the plot and eventual twist are decent, the film drags whenever Price isn’t on the screen. Even the film’s campiness and admittedly entertaining low-budget gags can’t inject enough life into the film to keep the mere hour and fourteen minutes from inching by.

     As a horror fan however, the film does offer an interesting look at the evolution of the genre. Despite the film’s silliness and overacting, the gimmicks that excite most audiences (flickering lights, loud noises, distant spectral figures, and gruesome death scenes) haven’t changed much in the past 50-plus years. Directors have access to better special effects, but the basic tropes of the genre remain. The film provides a rather interesting look at the execution of scares.

Scare Factor: 1/5 House on Haunted Hill hasn’t aged very well, and what may have been shocking to audiences in 1959 is more likely to induce chuckles and grogginess from modern viewers. Still, if you’re a film history buff invested in horror, it’s certainly worth a watch if only because of the impact it’s had on the genre and its marketing. 


**Available to watch on Netflix Instant.