Monday, October 5, 2015

31 Days of Horror- Day 5: May (2002)

(dir. Lucky McKee)

Lionsgate
*First time viewing

All May wants is a friend, and if she can’t find one, she’ll make one…piece by piece.

May’s offbeat tone takes some viewer adjustment. In fact, it was a half hour or so before I finally decided I was enjoying the movie. May plays like a rom-com, but the romances never come to fruition and the comedy is often too uncomfortable to actually laugh at. Every single one of May’s awkward attempts to find companionship, whether humorous or horrific, are tinged with sadness. It’s the emotional complexity of the formally bullied May, played by Angela Bettis, that grounds the film throughout her strange romantic entanglements and her progression from odd to insane. Co-stars Jeremy Sisto and Anna Faris are equally given complex motivations and despite their respective romances and break-ups with May, they aren’t turned into easy villains in May’s story. While the film’s heightened take on personality prevents any of the characters from feeling like people you’d encounter in the world, the emotional reality of their actions display a complexity and honesty that many movies, romantic-comedy or horror, are severely lacking. When things get bloody, and oh boy do they get bloody, McKee still keeps the tone and emotional balance intact. Instead of leaving viewers to anticipate gore and gleefully enjoy the kill scenes, he leaves them sympathetic of May’s loneliness.

Scare Factor: 2/5 May gets gory, but the horror here is based on the very human fear of being unloved. Sad, charming, and occasionally beautiful, May likely won’t be what you expect, but it’ll tug on your heartstrings for some time to come.


**Available on HBO Go

Sunday, October 4, 2015

31 Days of Horror- Day 4: Byzantium (2012)

(dir. Neil Jordan)

IFC Films
Mother and daughter vampires, Clara and Eleanor try to find a sense of normalcy in an abandoned hotel while on the run from a misogynistic vampire brotherhood.

Byzantium may be one of the few, perhaps the only feminist vampire story I can think of. This alone makes the film a worthwhile offering to the vampire film mythology. Jordan and screenwriter, Moira Buffini, abandon most of the cliché narrative arcs of vampires and instead offers a character driven mother-daughter story in which neither character understands how the other puts her life and emotions on the line to protect the other. Told through a present day narrative and extended flashbacks, the film fully fleshes out both characters and their respective plights. Leads Gemma Arterton and Saoirse Ronan both give equally sympathetic and calculated performances that raise the stakes of the drama. Most impressive is Jordan’s direction and Sean Bobbitt’s cinematography, which gives the entire film the look of German Romanticism. Together these aspects make Byzantium one of the most underrated and understated horror films in recent years.

Scare Factor: 1/5 Byzantium is a gothic horror film for those who aren’t looking to have nightmares this season, and a blast of fresh air for those who want a bit of a breather from their traditional horror fare. Beautiful and remarkably shot, Jordan’s film stands as one of the best modern vampire tales.


*Available to watch on Netflix Instant

Saturday, October 3, 2015

31 Days of Horror- Day 3: The Lazarus Effect (2015)

(dir. David Gelb)

Relativity Media

*First time viewing

The Lazarus Effect centers on a team of scientists who discover a serum to bring the dead back to life. When one of the scientists, Zoe, is killed by a freak lab accident, her husband resurrects her. The only problem is that Zoe’s soul has been left in hell and her body is left a violent killing machine.

There are a number of people who claim that good horror movies simply aren’t made anymore. This of course is bullshit, and anyone with a modicum of cinematic awareness knows this. Unfortunately for the people whose only knowledge in horror comes from bad studio-released star vehicles, The Lazarus Effect will only add further fuel to the ‘modern horror movies suck’ pyre. Without reservation, I can tell you that The Lazarus Effect is one of the worst, wide-released horror films of the modern era. Beyond just the laziness of its lame jump scares and lack of stakes, The Lazarus Effect is flat-out boring, completely devoid of personality in every aspect from the cast to the filmmaking. The cast, consisting of talented familiar faces given nothing to do, simply sit around and wait to be killed in the dull gray corridors of their locked lab. No one looks like they’re having any fun in this movie and it comes through in every frame.

It’s not so much the use of clichés that sink the film (even those can prove fun and effective with right creators and actors), it’s that every cliché feels like an afterthought. The dream sequences, power blackouts, soulless black eyes, and demonic voices are all seemingly used because it’s what other horror movies have done, not because it actually fits with the narrative setup or enhances the film. In theory, The Lazarus Effect could have at least been entertaining and stylish in its efforts to follow in the footsteps of Frankenstein and Re-Animator. Instead, we’re left with a bloodless, uneventful film that contributes nothing to the genre.

Scare Factor: 0/5 Simply awful all around. Its brisk 83 minute runtime is the film’s only positive attribute.

Friday, October 2, 2015

31 Days of Horror-Day 2: Honeymoon (2014)

(dir. Leigh Janiak)

Magnolia Pictures
I originally planned on saving this little gem until a little later in the month as it is, alongside It Follows, the most gripping horror film I’ve seen in 2015. But what the hell, let’s continue with a strong start. Honeymoon follows a newly married couple, Bea and Paul as they honeymoon at a cabin grounds from Bea’s childhood. But what starts as a romantic getaway quickly descends into horror after Bea disappears one night and returns…different.

Leigh Janiak makes an admirable directorial debut with Honeymoon, creating a film that not only holds up well amongst her contemporaries but also one that can stand alongside the directorial greats of the genre. While some of the film’s body horror elements clearly take a page from David Cronenberg, it’s the quiet moments of distrust, hurt, and pretend that make up the film’s most memorable moments. Rose Leslie and Harry Treadaway are both utterly convincing in their depiction of a couple who genuinely loves one another, but don’t understand what the other truly needs or wants. The isolated space they must dwell in forces them to interact with each other, and things that were once endearing become irritating, picking away at their interiors until both characters stand truly naked in front of each other for the first time. The film’s overarching metaphor may not be subtle, but it completely works because of how fully developed both characters are. But most impressive is Honeymoon’s ability to utilize the unfamiliar, not only in terms of how the characters see each other, but also in terms of the horror concepts at work.

Scare Factor: 5/5 Heart-breaking and unsettling, Honeymoon is like a more character-driven episode of The Twilight Zone, offering chilling moments of quiet and explicitly satisfying genre concepts.


*Available to watch on Netflix Instant

Thursday, October 1, 2015

31 Days of Horror-Day 1: Resolution (2012)

(dir. Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead)


Tribeca Film/Cinedigm

And we’re back with year two of 31 Days of Horror! Once again, I’ll mixing up the selection with old favorites, first time viewings, and new releases this October.

First up we have Justin Benson and Aaaron Moorhead’s Resolution. The film follows Michael, who travels to a remote cabin to forcibly save his junkie friend, Chris. The rapport between leads Peter Cilella and Vinny Curran is genuinely funny, but filled with enough drama and darkness to prevent the film from becoming a horror-comedy routine. Like any good cabin in the woods film, seclusion and companionship offer little safety. When mysterious items begin to show up around the cabin, including burned books, old photographs, and most alarmingly, recent video footage of Michael and Chris, the two friends must contend with an ancient force that plans on using their presumed redemption story for its own end. Resolution feels more like a mystery than traditional horror films often do, and viewed a certain way, the answer to Resolution’s central mystery lies in our own fascination with horror.

The setting of the film may be remote but the land is populated by a cadre of odd characters, and red herrings, all of which suggest the ancient force at the center of the film could stem from demonology, ghosts, UFO landings, or ancient tribal rituals. While we do get answers, the film doesn’t hinge on a left-field twist, rather Benson and Moorhead use the audience’s familiarity with horror tropes and stories to create their own modern mythology—one that both surprises and appeals to our need to understand forces beyond our reach. While meta-horror films and television shows are the current craze, Resolution manages to be meta without catering to our desire to feel smarter than the characters onscreen.

Scare Factor: 3/5 What Resolution may lack in terms of jump scares and gore, it makes up for with a genuinely haunting concept, one that may follow you through each and every horror film you consume this month.

**Film site, Audiences Everywhere will be featuring a variety of horror-themed articles and interviews this month including Founder and Editor-in-Chief David Shreve's conversation with Benson and Moorhead: http://www.audienceseverywhere.net/justin-benson-aaron-moorhead-interviews/


Follow and retweet @wetalkmovies on Twitter for your chance to win exclusive prize packages this month!

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Sicario Review

(dir. Denis Villeneuve)

Lionsgate

“Nothing will make sense to your American ears.”

If you’ve ever experienced a sudden heat rising in your throat, a certain indistinguishable quality to your hearing where everything seems distant and yet uncomfortably loud, a feeling not totally dissimilar to sinking, then you may have already gotten a taste of what Denis Villeneuve’s latest film is like in its finest moments. Sicario is a panic attack, not only in its efforts to create a visceral emotional experience for its audience, but also as a cinematic critique of a compassionless American government.

Sicario finds FBI Agent Kate Macer (Emily Blunt) handpicked by government consultant Matt Graver (Josh Brolin) to aid him, a team of CIA operatives, and the mysterious interrogator Alejandro (Benicio Del Toro) to hunt down a Mexican drug lord whose business has crossed the U.S. border. As their hunt leads them further across the border, and straight out of U.S. jurisdiction, Macer finds her loyalties tested and her sense of justice compromised. No longer protected by the laws she thought defined her, Macer finds herself an unwilling pawn in a squad of American-sanctioned hitmen. Like Prisoners and Enemy, Villeneuve takes his characters (and viewers) down a long, and winding tunnel of darkness where the light at the end is the illumination of their true selves, which they, and perhaps we, were hesitant to face.

In many ways, Sicario is like Westerns of old, the ones that saw cowboy ethics fall to the wayside as industrialization and railroads brought the frontier to an end. The west that Kate Macer finds herself in is also undergoing a massive upheaval in the form of drug runners from Mexico whose own railroads, in the form of secret, underground tunnels are reshaping the land. Blunt portrays Macer as stoically observant, quiet yet desperate for answers, professionally calm but privately emotional. For all intents and purposes she’s one of the last remaining bastions of empathy and unshakable righteousness in a cruel and lawless land—at least that’s how she regards herself. She’s unsure of her role within Graver’s team, but committed to the notion that she is acting heroically, preventing further death. But Villeneuve has displayed a consistent interest in deconstructing who his characters think they are, and who they realize they are when they find themselves in what Alejandro refers to as “a land of wolves.” Macer isn’t marked by a sharp and violent tragedy that sends her over the edge like Hugh Jackman’s Keller Dover in Prisoners. Instead she’s more akin to Gyllenhaal’s Detective Loki, a character whose good intentions and curiousness lead her to answers that shatter faith and purpose.

It is purpose that Brolin’s grinning, sandal-wearing Graver promises. With his almost callously easy-going nature, he isn’t concerned with the human interest side of wiping out the Mexican cartel--how it will better the lives of the citizens who live in fear of mutilation. He cares nothing for the people of Juarez, only for what the destruction of the cartel will mean for the future of American politics. He’s chaos, as the film puts it, especially when compared to Del Toro’s orderly and ominous Alejandro whose greatest fault may be that he is too human, too connected to the past, to be just. Screenwriter Taylor Sheridan carefully situates Macer between these two men, resulting in three conflicting reflections of America and no clear winner. While the film’s many plot points and twists create a somewhat winding narrative that isn’t always easy to follow in the moment, Sheridan’s script only serves to showcase the complex nature of offensive political measures and power moves.

Villeneuve skillfully handles the film’s action-oriented conflicts, refusing to turn the film into an action-movie and yet creating tactical shootouts that serve as highpoints in the film. Every gunshot feels startlingly real and close, almost conditioning the audience to dread the shootouts, or at least find them startling instead of comforting popcorn fare. Sicario doesn’t display a condemnation of violence. The film is brutal and stylishly edited in its depiction of it, but it never establishes its stakes in a way where heroes and villains can be delineated. In the film’s longest shootout scene during the third act, the targets are never shown. We see the CIA firing guns, we see retaliation, hear shouts, and eventually see bodies, but Villeneuve never situates the audience in a position to clap, cheer, or whatever it is people do during major battle scenes. So while the American government the film depicts may be solely focused on big picture actions, Villeneuve is interested in the up close and personal ones, the shots that count.

Sicario’s sense of impending, unavoidable doom and bleakness is furthered by incomparable cinematographer Roger Deakins and composer Jóhann Jóhannsson. Deakins constructs some of the best shots of the year, creating an almost constant sense of downward motion. In one of the film’s best scenes, Deakins captures Macer alongside a team of CIA operatives as they move down a slope, disappearing into the shadow created by the setting sun. In the film’s many overhead landscape shots, the camera slowly moves across the dry land, distorting it so that it almost looks like close-ups of bones. Death and descent permeate the film, and Jóhannsson’s score shifts between dark, rhythmic pulses, and what can only be described as the musical equivalent of children crying. And yet this near constant bleakness is contrasted by the daylight of most scenes, and the film’s color palate that consists primarily of shades of yellow and orange. These serve as reminders that however harsh the events on screen may be and however murky the film gets in terms of plot points and character motivations, there is always illumination at the end. Perhaps not warm or appealing, but illumination all the same.

There are fleeting moments of humor, but in the end there is little hope to be found in the film’s message. And yet despite this, or perhaps because of it, Sicario is one of the year’s best films. It is entirely uncompromising in vision and denunciation without feeling trite, unwarranted, or grossly political. Sicario is a riveting, entertaining and disheartening light that leads us out of the Western Civilization we once knew.

Grade: A

Thursday, August 20, 2015

American Ultra Review

(dir. Nima Nourizadeh)

Lionsgate

“Something very weird is happening to me. I keep killing people.”

It’s official: we’ve reached peak-espionage film levels this year. With the previous offerings of Kingsman: The Secret Service, Spy, Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation, The Man From U.N.C.L.E. and the upcoming Hitman: Agent 47, Bridge of Spies, and Spectre, we’re certainly not lacking for secret agents and world-shattering stakes. Yet the dearth of all of these movies, only serve to make American Ultra all the more energizing a take on the sub-genre. While it may not deliver what’s expected, it’s certainly better than the marketing has promised.

Part stoner-comedy and part spy-thriller, American Ultra follows anxiety-ridden, pot-fiend, Mike Howell (Jesse Eisenberg) and his sympathetic, yet frustrated girlfriend, Phoebe (Kristen Stewart). When Mike and Phoebe become government targets, he discovers he’s far more equipped to deal with the world than he ever imagined. With recently discovered and deadly spy skills, and a bit of a buzz, Mike must survive an onslaught of rogue government agents from the program that created him.

While Eisenberg’s trademark awkwardness may make him a suitable choice for an anxious stoner, buying him as an action hero is a bit harder to swallow. Thankfully the film never makes a hard-turn in terms of his characterization. There is no Pretty Woman-esque transformation, no “manners maketh man” transition. Mike simply remains a lowly-convenience store attendant with a few burned out brain cells and a heaping of extra skills. As a result, the film’s twists are believable and never more laughable than they should be. Kristen Stewart, who gets plenty of twists and laughs of her own, is really good in her role as Phoebe. Partly because of the script, and partly because of Stewart’s performance, Phoebe never feels like dead weight, but instead a necessary and welcome presence on screen. There’s a genuine level of sincerity and empathy that Stewart can emit, given the right script, and in American Ultra she adds a lot of heart to the film and gets in on a sizeable chunk of the action. There’s not a weak-link in the supporting cast of Connie Britton, Topher Grace, John Leguizamo, but it’s Walton Goggins’ psychotic agent, Laughter, who nearly steals the show. While there’s a certain level of familiarity to each of the roles, the cast add enough of their own touches to give each scene a level of unpredictability even in the most exposition-heavy scenes.

While Nima Nourizadeh only directed one film prior to this (the found-footage party film, Project X) he displays a capable handle on staging intimate scenes and action sequences. His filmmaking is reminiscent of Matthew Vaughn in many ways, especially in his clever uses of lighting, music, and getting the most out of a modest budget. While Nourizadeh doesn’t quite take advantage of space in the same way Vaughn does, he excels at capturing the feeling of old-school action movies. While many movies of late have tried to deliver on that promise (i.e. John Wick) Nourizadeh comes the closest by understanding the frequently messy choreography of those fights and refusing to rely too much on gunplay. There’s an attack on a police station early on that’s every bit as skillful as the one in The Terminator, and the finale gives The Equalizer a run for its money with the best use of props in an action-sequence. Nourizadeh infuses American Ultra with a surprisingly varied amount of ultra-violence that has the ugly edge so many modern action films have been missing.

Even with the genuine, and surprising performances of the cast and Nourizadeh’s imaginative direction, the true star of American Ultra is scribe Max Landis. American Ultra distinctly carries Landis’ voice, even more so than his film-debut, Chronicle. Landis wears his comic book influences on his sleeve, and while the film isn’t based on any pre-existing material, it’s easy to see how the film would work as a graphic novel. The film’s editing-both the in way the film moves between its key players and the deliberate, self-aware pacing-is reminiscent of reading a comic from panel to panel. The humor is also distinctly Landis’ and while some jokes fall a bit short, and the film is rarely laugh-out-loud funny, it remains consistently clever enough to put a stupid grin across your face for most of its runtime. From simply a narrative standpoint, American Ultra is saved by the fact that it never attempts to be a full-fledged comedy. There’s enough high-stakes drama and tension to keep the film from ever feeling like a parody of spy-thrillers.

While we’ve come to expect big-stakes action in espionage films, the biggest stakes in American Ultra are the personal ones, and that’s something Landis and Nourizadeh never lose sight of. It’s not the fate of the world, or even America at jeopardy, but small-town West Virginia. Mike doesn’t have to navigate a one-and-done relationship with a mysterious femme fatale, but strengthen the relationship with the woman he plans to marry. The film never tries to do more than the budget allows or what the story requires, and in this regard it’s not so different from the early Hitchcock spy-thrillers that created the subgenre. American Ultra is a film that entirely succeeds in exactly what it tries to be—an achievement to take note of. Everything is pleasingly on the surface, and the film manages to stay exciting because of this. While the film is a little too unrefined on the technical side of things at times, and occasionally too enchanted with its own cleverness to work for everyone, American Ultra successfully lives up to its midnight movie forbearers to deliver what could be the cult hit of the year.


Grade: A-